the 'Water is a public good, inalienable and must be free for everyone. and I, and I hope everyone, I will fight because it remains: it is a clear language and is a right and a basic good food that does not have profits.
I mentioned earlier that the water should be free, the only thing we have to pay is the distribution system that risorsa.La maintenance of the water system. 2 problems here and descend / costumes important.
the water we pay for convenience (arriving in our homes, while the old if they went to take .. but where was the aqueducts in the Roman Empire was free ...) and network maintenance and people who work there.
obvious MONEY PUBBLICI.Il virtuous concept is (would be) that gave that taxes (and there are few resources from fees. as avoidance, evasion ...) we should restrict the waste of money and water by taking actions in order to pay today for the network operations struttuali water, making it possible to pay less in the long run.
E 'was done the opposite: it has paid little in the past, putting pieces here and there (and using the money for other things, such as paving roads and developing the road transport .. but to create jobs .. FIAT automotive and trucking is a ... 'other infrastructural and environmental scourge of Italy: he thought he streets and cars and now to move goods and people pay more to pollute more, while if we had used the funds for diversification and mixed equitable transport system would ogi economic, environmental and time per kilometer. We wanted to create a monopoly for transportation: rubber, and today we are paying all the consequences.)
WATER reasoning is different but with similar meanings.
We wanted to spend a little getting used to other funds, making serviceable stopgap but not structural and we now find ourselves with huge damage and waste hallucinating.
Unfortunately those responsible for this are the public officials that we voted (giving little importance to water management, which was not even in the programs of candidates for Prime Minister / mayors / governors / presidents because "There is so much water in Italy").
If I were to draw a parallel with the economic crisis I would say that until two years ago it was said, "so the market is fine" then (given the time of fat in which economic resources were ...) are not made system interventions (training, education, research, innovation ...) and now there are no bases on these issues, but if the first was no money to cover these shortcomings of the system struttuali country now there are even those ..
back to water ...
Then she gave it all to individuals in management, because it was thought that applying the criterion of economic efficiency is improved and rationalized the private water system.
MA individuals found themselves in his hands a colander with large holes and high operating costs and then they raised the prices of the resource to at least break even budget.
This is the premise but ITALY for a bit 'all over the world (more or less) in part states north erupei ...
I believe that an efficient public institution is the best solution, but because the institutions did not rightly look to the cost-benefit cost-effective but often create an unbearable economic deficit for the public purse, then devolved to the private sector.
EXAMPLE: if the public authority will sell the water to 5 and the price is fair and 5 sostenbile economically for the people, not for the entity that the cost of 7-8 gave the poor situation of water supply and sewerage system. Fortunately, for a period because you sold it to 5 does not have to make ends meet and may have other taxes that offset the deficit or loss. In the long run, however, the deficit is impossible to cover cost increases and other revenue from fees. then everything goes to the private entity (with legal forms of public control but still have a limited impact on the actions and choices of private .. see municipal) arrives private sells you the water at least 8 to break even (rightly : the private is not bad, but because they can not afford a private economic deficit and rightly wants to at least match, but then you will sell to earn 9 or 10.) It seems unfair to the citizen (used to pay waste water of its territory).
not really have anything illegal or wrong.
costs very little water to the tap (it costs an average of 1 euro per cubic meter) and then costs 1 euro per thousand liters: WITH THIS SINCE I'll only understand what we earn (but millions of euro on a ... ADVERTISING insanely good that I buy at the supermarket .. no! ... who sells bottled water in PET bottles (polyethylene plastic =), which creates lots of waste and pollution from road transport ... obviously ... I hope
have been clear, but maybe I expressed myself badly, we'll talk ....
and you can see by the size of post topics that are very passionate about me, is called "sostenbilità (understood as economic sustainability, environmental and social) resources and public goods"
know that the post is very technical but I wanted to share with you good night
0 comments:
Post a Comment